Delhi Supreme Court has given the verdict over the controversial matter “Live together will be taken as marriage or not” that if a man and a woman are residing jointly for a long time and have been established by the society as husband and wife, a presumption of a legal marriage can be drawn. “A long cohabitation and acceptance of society of a man and woman as husband and wife goes a long way in establishing a valid marriage,” a Bench of Justices S B Sinha and Cyriac Joseph were there too. The Bench declared when disputes of valid marriages come into question, courts can illustrate an opinion on the basis of the conduct between the two parties. In arriving at a judgment of information, the trial judge was not only permitted to analyse the confirmations brought on record by the parties so as to come to a termination as to whether all the ingredients of a valid marriage as contained in Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 stand established or not. But many countries have not taken “Live together” as a marriage.

For an instance, in England there is no officially authorized or any legal definition of living together, it simply says to ignore the matter that  live together as a couple devoid of being married. A cohabitation contract or living together agreement is there through which one can draw his or her legal bindings. However living together contract outlines the rights and obligations of each partner towards each other. But there is no any clear picture whether living together agreements are lawfully enforceable but they can be constructive to take you back a couple of their original target. Putting into practice, as an alternative of a living together agreement, it is possible to make a series of legally enforceable agreements on particular matters, for example, how a jointly-owned house is shared. And in this case legal advice will be desired to solve.   Many societies questioned against the conception and said it will mark a stress in our society which believes only conventional marriages. People believe the reality and already acknowledge with the matter “living together” which is lacks the commitment that a marriage extends. It’s possible that many young adults think from the reality that they should live together before marriage for the reason that their own parents were unsuccessful at relationship. And it is really insensitive for young adults to witness parents go through a painful separation and has dealt with the pain of a failed family.

Inappropriateness is a main cause for a failed marriage; either the idea was wrong at first or the couple failed to love wholeheartedly. The mistaken belief that you might be able to do better than them by first living together with someone before marriage is imprecise.  According to the law, it has been treated as a marriage so that couple can have their place in society rather than to be distinguished as an isolated, hatred concept of few people. And there is no need to apply hide and seek policy if any couple intend to get marriage.